Archive for Football

Austria: Worst Euro Hosts Ever?

Austrian Men's National Football Team 2008

I’ve been hearing a lot of criticism of Austria’s national football team. As co-hosts of the Euro 2008 tournament along with Switzerland, Austria’s team didn’t have to go through the gruelling qualification process that the other 14 teams did, and most people feel that the Austrians are the weakest team in the tournament by a long way. But after seeing them play Croatia on the weekend, I’d have to say they played some very gutsy football. In particular, a young Turkish-Austrian lad named Ümit Korkmaz was simply a joy to watch, and his enthusiasm and dogged play just may lead to a sneaky goal or two before Austria likely make their early exit. Instead of berating them for not being, say, Germany, shouldn’t we be cheering on a team who are clearly getting the chance of a lifetime to play against some of Europe’s (and the world’s) finest?

Go Austria!

Comments

Breakaway States

Monocle, Volume 1, Issue 6

New magazine Monocle (founded by Canadian Tyler Brulé, of Wallpaper fame) has a fascinating series of articles on breakaway states and country branding in its September 2007 issue. Unfortunately, you’ll have to buy the printed magazine since only subscribers have access to full articles online, but you can see the photo essay on the breakaway republic of Abkhazia on the Black Sea. It declared its independence from the former Soviet Republic of Georgia in 1994, but so far not a single government has officially recognized its independence. The magazine, by the way, is beautiful and interesting and worth its slightly lofty cover price.

The same issue lists several other non-recognized “countries” that are seeking recognition in various ways, whether it be petitioning the United Nations or through sport. FIFA is one organization that features teams from several entities that are not recognized counties with United Nations representation. Many of these unrecognized states feel that it is through sport (and football in particular) that they can generate support for their nations.

Journalist Steve Menary has just published an interesting book on this very subject entitled Outcasts: The Lands That FIFA Forgot. Read more about it at the author’s blog.

Monocle Article on Abkhazia (subscribers only, but there are some good links included for the rest of us)

Comments off

Groundhoppers

From my film blog, Toronto Screen Shots:

Groundhoppers

Groundhoppers (Director: Eivind Tolås, Norway, 2005): Thank goodness for the internet. While reading about obsessive football (soccer) fans who attempt to visit as many football grounds as possible, I came across the title of this Norwegian documentary. I was able to get in touch with the filmmaker and convince him to send me a copy to review. As far as I know, this film was broadcast on Norwegian television, and played a few film festivals in Europe, but has never been seen in North America. But that’s ok, because the phenomenon of “groundhopping” probably wouldn’t make as much sense here. (The only thing comparable might be someone trying to visit all the Major League baseball parks).

Kjell Morten and Bjarte are two middle-aged brothers who spend all of their vacations in England, attending football matches. Their goal is to visit all 92 grounds of the teams that comprise the Football League. This includes the Premiership (20 teams), the Championship (24 teams) and Leagues One and Two (24 teams each), which together comprise the top four tiers of English football. As you can imagine, “groundhoppers” are usually men, usually single, and have a certain amount of time and disposable income at their command.

The two Norwegians have been at it for more than ten years, and are up to sixty-odd stadia visited. Perhaps stadia is too grand a term, for some of the lower league clubs play in some very modest circumstances indeed. Basing themselves in Rotherham, “one of Britain’s poorest cities” according to the film, they’ve adopted the local team, Rotherham United, nicknamed the Millers as their home team away from home.

At home in Bergen, though, it’s all about SK Brann, and one of the film’s most charming moments comes watching the brothers as they witness their team’s triumph in Norway’s own Cup Final.

All in all, this is a light-hearted look at a harmless (if inexplicable to most) obsession. I think if I had the advantages of living in Europe (generous vacation allowances, short distances, cheap transportation, and a wealth of football clubs), I’d be joining the boys in the stands.

I have attended football matches in three different countries, though: Canada, Uruguay, and Slovenia. Just a few hundred more to go…

More on Rotherham United FC (the Millers)
More on SK Brann
Groundtastic, a magazine devoted to football grounds
Football Grounds In Focus, The No.1 Groundhopping website ‘made for travellers by travellers’
Done The Lot - Fans who have visited all 92 English Football League grounds

Comments off

The Crumbling Wreck of Uruguayan Football

by Thomas Dunmore

Whilst we English wring our hands over the ever disappointing state of our football team, our situation is in no way as sorry a fall as others have experienced. Uruguay, for example, have scaled peaks of international football that England have never reached; equally, they have fallen to an ignnomy that England have also not yet matched.

Rodrigo Orihuela has connected the fall of the national team to the similar problems in England and Spain.

Uruguay’s problems are not exactly unique. The recent unconvincing form of the English national team has given rise to a barrage of comments from pundits who believe English football is suffering from the impact of too many foreign players blocking the emergence of local talent. Similar arguments have been heard in Spain and Germany over recent years. Uruguayan football suffers from a similar syndrome: too little homebred talent plays regularly in the top flight before being whisked off to far off lands where the pay is better.

But whilst club football thrives in England and Spain – at least, financially and in terms of continental success – Uruguayan teams have reached a new low in the Copa Libertadores. As Orihuela notes:

Results such as reigning champion Danubio’s defeat last week in a Copa Libertadores qualifier, which saw it knocked out of the tournament by Argentina’s Vélez Sarfsielfd on a 0-5 aggregate score, are cause of concern in the tiny Atlantic nation. It is unprecedented for Uruguayan club champions to miss out on the Libertadores group stage.

Once, it was Uruguay whose economic boom in the 1920s was reflected in its football: Nacional of Montevideo embarked on a six month European tour in 1925, playing 38 games often on the back of gruelling, long rail journeys, of which they won 26, drew seven and lost six. Uruguay’s Centenario stadium – built for the 1930 World Cup – was known as the greatest ever made and an architectural paean to Uruguay’s modernism.

And it was the Uruguayans who in many ways first brought South American flair to the world’s game, as Eduardo Galeano waxed in Soccer in Sun and Shadow:

Forty years before the Brazilians Pele and Coutinho, the Uruguayans Scarone and Cea rolled over the rival’s defense with zigzag passes that went back and forth from one to the other all the way to the goal, yours and mine, close and right to the foot, question and response, response and question: the ball rebounded without a moment’s pause, as if off a wall.

Uruguay have won the World Cup twice and the Copa America fourteen times (seven times more than Brazil). Not bad for a country of 3.5 million people. A decline from such heights, considering Uruguay can barely sustain its own league in good form, was probably inevitable. But it was football that made a Uruguayan pronounce on the back of their Olympic triumph in 1928: “We are no longer just a tiny spot on the map of the world.”

Galeano again:

The sky-blue shirt was proof of the existence of the nation: Uruguay was not a mistake. Soccer pulled this tiny country out of the shadows of universal anonymity.

Yet sadly, even the site of Uruguay’s greatest triumph – their shocking 4-2 defeat of Argentina in the World Cup final at Estadio Centenario in Montevideo on July 30th 1930 – has little time left. Unlike Wembley Stadium, it has not been rebuilt at massive (and admittedly overblown) cost. Uruguay have long had an enviable record at home, only losing twice in twenty games with Brazil. Still, Estadio Centenario is now a crumbling wreck, awaiting its final fate, as David Goldblatt writes in the The Ball is Round:

Soon it will be gone altogether, its experimental reinforced concrete unable to deal with the salt air of the Atlantic. It has, perhaps, less than a hundred years. Maybe climate change will get there first. The Rio de la Plata will flood the city and leave it marooned: a carved grey beacon alerting sailors to submerged treasures.

Reposted with permission. Original post appeared Sunday February 18, 2007 on Thomas Dunmore’s If This Is Football, a blog about “football politics, economics and history.”

Editor’s Note: My wife and I visited Uruguay in November 2005 and visited the Estadio Centenario. Unfortunately, our visit fell between Uruguay’s last World Cup qualifying match against Australia and the Classico derby between Nacional and Peñarol. We did, however, see Nacional play Liverpool (the Uruguayan team) to a boring scoreless draw at the much smaller Parque Central stadium. Uruguay has the melancholy feeling of an entire country lost in the remembrances of past glories, whether in sport, politics or business, and it’s a shame, because it’s a beautiful and hospitable place.

Comments (2)

ELF Cup 2006

ELF Cup

One of the most commented-upon entries on Runner-Up is the one on the Viva World Cup, an event for countries currently without representation with FIFA.There have been some issues getting the tournament up and running, and one commenter has helpfully pointed out that there is another tournament established called the ELF Cup. It’s being held from November 18-25 (ie. it’s going on right now) in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, and features eight teams, including the host country along with Tibet, Greenland, Crimea, Gagauzia, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Zanzibar.

The Wikipedia entry has some good information on the controversy surrounding the tournament.

The original Viva World Cup 2006 is also taking place this week, in Occitania in the south of France, but with only four teams, 12 fewer than originally hoped. Financial and logistical problems plague many of the teams, and the infighting between the NF-Board (sponsor of the Viva World Cup) and the KTFF (sponsor of the ELF Cup) hasn’t made it any easier for these teams to play each other. Let’s hope that they can patch things up so that the next tournament will have a full complement of teams.

Comments (1)

« Previous entries