From the category archives:

Sports

The Crumbling Wreck of Uruguayan Football

by James McNally on February 20, 2007

by Thomas Dunmore

Whilst we English wring our hands over the ever disappointing state of our football team, our situation is in no way as sorry a fall as others have experienced. Uruguay, for example, have scaled peaks of international football that England have never reached; equally, they have fallen to an ignnomy that England have also not yet matched.

Rodrigo Orihuela has connected the fall of the national team to the similar problems in England and Spain.

Uruguay’s problems are not exactly unique. The recent unconvincing form of the English national team has given rise to a barrage of comments from pundits who believe English football is suffering from the impact of too many foreign players blocking the emergence of local talent. Similar arguments have been heard in Spain and Germany over recent years. Uruguayan football suffers from a similar syndrome: too little homebred talent plays regularly in the top flight before being whisked off to far off lands where the pay is better.

But whilst club football thrives in England and Spain – at least, financially and in terms of continental success – Uruguayan teams have reached a new low in the Copa Libertadores. As Orihuela notes:

Results such as reigning champion Danubio’s defeat last week in a Copa Libertadores qualifier, which saw it knocked out of the tournament by Argentina’s Vélez Sarfsielfd on a 0-5 aggregate score, are cause of concern in the tiny Atlantic nation. It is unprecedented for Uruguayan club champions to miss out on the Libertadores group stage.

Once, it was Uruguay whose economic boom in the 1920s was reflected in its football: Nacional of Montevideo embarked on a six month European tour in 1925, playing 38 games often on the back of gruelling, long rail journeys, of which they won 26, drew seven and lost six. Uruguay’s Centenario stadium – built for the 1930 World Cup – was known as the greatest ever made and an architectural paean to Uruguay’s modernism.

And it was the Uruguayans who in many ways first brought South American flair to the world’s game, as Eduardo Galeano waxed in Soccer in Sun and Shadow:

Forty years before the Brazilians Pele and Coutinho, the Uruguayans Scarone and Cea rolled over the rival’s defense with zigzag passes that went back and forth from one to the other all the way to the goal, yours and mine, close and right to the foot, question and response, response and question: the ball rebounded without a moment’s pause, as if off a wall.

Uruguay have won the World Cup twice and the Copa America fourteen times (seven times more than Brazil). Not bad for a country of 3.5 million people. A decline from such heights, considering Uruguay can barely sustain its own league in good form, was probably inevitable. But it was football that made a Uruguayan pronounce on the back of their Olympic triumph in 1928: “We are no longer just a tiny spot on the map of the world.”

Galeano again:

The sky-blue shirt was proof of the existence of the nation: Uruguay was not a mistake. Soccer pulled this tiny country out of the shadows of universal anonymity.

Yet sadly, even the site of Uruguay’s greatest triumph – their shocking 4-2 defeat of Argentina in the World Cup final at Estadio Centenario in Montevideo on July 30th 1930 – has little time left. Unlike Wembley Stadium, it has not been rebuilt at massive (and admittedly overblown) cost. Uruguay have long had an enviable record at home, only losing twice in twenty games with Brazil. Still, Estadio Centenario is now a crumbling wreck, awaiting its final fate, as David Goldblatt writes in the The Ball is Round:

Soon it will be gone altogether, its experimental reinforced concrete unable to deal with the salt air of the Atlantic. It has, perhaps, less than a hundred years. Maybe climate change will get there first. The Rio de la Plata will flood the city and leave it marooned: a carved grey beacon alerting sailors to submerged treasures.

Reposted with permission. Original post appeared Sunday February 18, 2007 on Thomas Dunmore’s If This Is Football, a blog about “football politics, economics and history.”

Editor’s Note: My wife and I visited Uruguay in November 2005 and visited the Estadio Centenario. Unfortunately, our visit fell between Uruguay’s last World Cup qualifying match against Australia and the Classico derby between Nacional and Peñarol. We did, however, see Nacional play Liverpool (the Uruguayan team) to a boring scoreless draw at the much smaller Parque Central stadium. Uruguay has the melancholy feeling of an entire country lost in the remembrances of past glories, whether in sport, politics or business, and it’s a shame, because it’s a beautiful and hospitable place.

ELF Cup 2006

by James McNally on November 20, 2006

ELF Cup

One of the most commented-upon entries on Runner-Up is the one on the Viva World Cup, an event for countries currently without representation with FIFA.There have been some issues getting the tournament up and running, and one commenter has helpfully pointed out that there is another tournament established called the ELF Cup. It’s being held from November 18-25 (ie. it’s going on right now) in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, and features eight teams, including the host country along with Tibet, Greenland, Crimea, Gagauzia, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Zanzibar.

The Wikipedia entry has some good information on the controversy surrounding the tournament.

The original Viva World Cup 2006 is also taking place this week, in Occitania in the south of France, but with only four teams, 12 fewer than originally hoped. Financial and logistical problems plague many of the teams, and the infighting between the NF-Board (sponsor of the Viva World Cup) and the KTFF (sponsor of the ELF Cup) hasn’t made it any easier for these teams to play each other. Let’s hope that they can patch things up so that the next tournament will have a full complement of teams.

The Loss Brazilian Soccer Fans Can Never Forget

by James McNally on June 11, 2006

by Brian Maitland

The 2006 World Cup Finals have started in Germany and Brazil are the overwhelming favourites to win it all for the second time in a row. If they do come through, it will be their sixth World Cup title. No other nation really comes close to Brazil’s success, though Italy and Germany (or West Germany, if you get technical) lag behind with three World Cup titles each.

Despite this unprecedented success at the world level, there will always be something missing—the title Brazil lost the only time it ever hosted the World Cup Finals. Even today, that 2-1 loss in 1950 to Uruguay is still a source of consternation and gnaws at this soccer loving nation’s psyche.

World Cup 1950 Poster

Officially the 2-1 loss did not occur in a final, as amazingly there was no final in 1950. This was the first World Cup since 1938, thanks to World War II canceling out two potential World Cup tournaments in 1942 and 1946, and the new tournament format introduced was bizarre. After group play, the second round was not contested via the typical knockout format. The final four teams were organized into a “final” group. Each team played each other team and the team with the most points would be crowned champions.

It just so happened that the last match of this final group turned out to be between the top two teams. Brazil only needed a draw to win the title, while Uruguay needed to win to top the group.

Brazil's National Team 1950
Brazil’s National Team 1950 (photo copyright FIFA and Popperfoto)

To fully comprehend what happened, remember that this was 1950. Brazil did not win its first World Cup until 1958. Although Brazil had finished a respectable third at the 1938 World Cup Finals in France, it had not yet become the all-conquering championship side most of the world knows and loves now.

Arguably, Uruguay should have received more respect going into that last match. The tiny country that lies wedged between the giant nations of Brazil and Argentina was a soccer powerhouse. It had won de facto world titles at the 1924 and 1928 Olympic Games as well as the first World Cup in 1930 which it hosted.

Brazil’s second place finish at the 1950 World Cup ended up being its best ever placing up to that point. Yet not one Brazilian celebrated what to many nations, then or now, would be seen as a great achievement.

You see, the buildup to that match with Uruguay is what made the loss seem like the end of the world. Having built the world’s largest stadium for this tournament, the 200,000 capacity Maracana in Rio de Janeiro, the grand stage was set. The entire nation was abuzz, especially after Brazil hammered Sweden 7-1 and Spain 6-1 in the two matches leading up to the Uruguay match. Then there was the recent history between the teams, with Brazil taking two wins in three matches held prior to the World Cup Finals that year.

So, with the Maracana filled to capacity and Brazil on form, how could the team fail? This question has puzzled not only the players, coaches, media and fans, it has inspired artists since that fateful day. A number of best-selling books and hit films are still being made about this national tragedy decades later. No one has the definitive answer but some fascinating things developed from the event.

World Cup 1950 Winning Goal
Uruguay’s Alcides Ghiggia puts the winning goal past Brazilian keeper Barbosa
(photo copyright FIFA and Popperfoto)

Barbosa, the keeper who allowed the fateful winning goal with just 12 minutes left in the match, ended up being shunned by Brazil’s national team selectors. Despite being named the best goalkeeper at the 1950 Finals, he only played one more match for Brazil. He actually ended up one day uprooting the Maracana goalposts from that cursed goal he was defending in the second half. He invited a few loyal friends over for a barbecue, and then started a huge bonfire using the posts as firewood.

Most of his teammates were viewed as cursed, too. Although many continued their club careers and even won Brazilian titles afterwards, only Bauer made it onto the 1954 World Cup Finals’ squad, and that Brazilian team failed miserably. They were knocked out at the quarter-final stage in one of the most infamous matches in soccer history—the 4-2 loss to Hungary in the Battle of Berne. Strangely, that side largely got off scot-free despite disgracing the nation far more with their unsportsmanship play against the Magyars.

Brazil even changed its jersey to today’s famous yellow and green after the 1950 defeat. The national team would never again wear the all-white with blue collar shirts it wore in the defeat by Uruguay.

So, although, Brazil is now a world beater, they are still the only winners of a World Cup to have failed to lift the trophy when hosting the World Cup Finals. There is hope that Brazil can stage the 2014 World Cup Finals since the plan is to award the tournament to a South American nation. Brazilians would love to finally see their national side crowned champions on home soil. This would avenge the 1950 tragedy of defeat in Rio. Until that day comes, July 16th (the date of that fateful 1950 final) remains a day of tragedy for many Brazilians, despite the five World Cup titles won by the world’s most successful national soccer team.

More on the story of the 1950 World Cup “Final”

FIFI Wild Cup

by James McNally on June 5, 2006

FIFI Wild Cup

Last summer, I wrote about the Viva World Cup, which is contested by “nations” not recognized by FIFA or the UN. Now, in the runup to this year’s FIFA World Cup, behold the FIFI Wild Cup, also played between non-recognized groups. It started out as a way to arrange a match between Tibet and the newly-declared Republic of St. Pauli (actually a district of Hamburg that declared independence solely to field a team to play against the Tibetans). Other teams joined in and Northern Cyprus (the Turkish-occupied half of the island of Cyprus, only recognized by Turkey) won the trophy. It was a succesful tournament, despite the presence of only six teams (Tibet, St. Pauli, and Northern Cyprus were joined by Greenland, Zanzibar and Gibraltar). There were more than 4,000 fans at the final, though that did include the members of all the defeated teams.

FIFI Wild Cup Champs Northern Cyrpus
FIFI Wild Cup Champs Northern Cyprus

Controversy will surely follow the win of the Northern Cypriot team, with many commenters on the Guardian’s report reacting unfavourably to giving any publicity whatsoever to the Turkish “occupiers” of Cyprus.

Report from The Guardian

Report from Spiegel (in English)

Toronto Falcons/Metros/Metros-Croatia/Blizzard

by James McNally on May 7, 2006

Toronto Blizzard

Recently, I watched the excellent documentary Once in a Lifetime: The Extraordinary Story of the New York Cosmos, and it got me thinking about the North American Soccer League. The NASL operated from 1968-1984 and included a number of Canadian teams.

The league’s popularity began to rise in the late 1970s after the Cosmos signed aging Brazilian star Pelé and then several other European and Latin American players. This resulted in their second league title in 1977 (the first was in 1972). They went on to repeat as champions in 1978, 1980 and 1982, and along with their league-leading attendance, this made them the most successful franchise in league history.

But I’m from Toronto. And I noticed that the champions in 1976 were a team called the Toronto Metros-Croatia. And that in the final two years of the league’s existence, the Toronto Blizzard made it to the championship games and lost twice. Who were these guys, and why in less than twenty years did Toronto have four different team names?

Well, the Toronto Falcons played only one full year in the NASL (1968) before renaming themselves the Toronto Metros, and in 1975 they were joined by a team called the Toronto Croatia. This ethnic club had played in Toronto since 1956 as part of the Canadian National Soccer League. In 1978, the team split again, with the NASL team renaming themselves the Toronto Blizzard and Toronto Croatia returning to the CNSL. This team continues to play today in the Canadian Professional Soccer League, while the Blizzard struggled on for another ten years in various lesser leagues when the NASL folded. What happened to professional soccer in Toronto after that?

Toronto has had a franchise called the Toronto Lynx in the United Soccer Leagues since 1997, and in 2007 will have a team in the successful Major League Soccer organization. There’s a small chance that it will be called the Toronto Blizzard (although it’s looking more likely that it will carry the inanely pseudo-European moniker of “Inter Toronto FC”). There’s even a petition to bring back the Blizzard name.

Here’s a nice tribute site to the original Toronto Blizzard, true runners-up.

The NASL Alumni Association arranged a reunion for more than 60 former players in September 2005.